狮子王的读后感500:《狮子王》的读后感，英语的！

1.《狮子王》的读后感，英语的！

今天老师让我们看了《狮子王》，我很感动，让我学到了很多道理，不要学刀疤欺负小朋友。《狮子王》这部片子，大体内容是：辛巴的爸爸是百兽之王，只要有光明的地方全是辛巴的爸爸管得，黑暗的地方没有动物管着，全是土狼，还有一只狮子叫刀疤，它当不上百兽之王，就想当黑暗的地方当百兽之王。刀疤就来到黑暗的地方，那里的土狼都饿肚子，要是你们听我的“我就可以不让你们饿肚子，刀疤就当上了。那时候刀疤的心已经变坏了”刀疤派了三只土狼。要把牛追的往前跑，那时候辛巴正在那里，牛跑得比辛巴快，辛巴跑到了树上，辛巴的爸爸赶快去救辛巴，辛巴的爸爸赶紧把辛巴扔到石头上，辛巴的爸爸掉进了在奔跑的牛的中间，辛巴的爸爸又爬了上来，辛巴的爸爸让刀疤把它拉上来，可没把没把辛巴的爸爸拉上来，用他的手，让辛巴的爸爸掉进牛群里，辛巴的爸爸就被牛踩死了，刀疤说，辛巴赶紧跑得远远的，辛巴跑到了一个森林里：他发现了两个朋友“辛巴和那两个朋友一直玩到大。过了一段时间”有一只狮子来劝他，新把你赶快回去吧，要不我们会别饿死的，辛巴就去了，它跟刀疤打了一仗，辛巴赢了，辛巴特别勇敢、聪明、坚强，刀疤特别坏，这个故事特别好看，我喜欢辛巴。要像辛巴一样遇到困难的时候不害怕，要坚强勇敢。不要像刀疤一样干坏事，这部片子很好看，我很喜欢，Today，thelionking"，strong;ofthefilm,scar,said,",Ican',tletyoustarve.",can'letSimba',sfatherfellintotheherd;Simba'"runaway.",hefoundthetwofriend:overaperiodoftime;smart,strong,Ilike.,

2.狮子王中文观后感

观《狮子王》有感《狮子王》描述的是非洲大草原的动物王国的生活，实际上它的主题超越任何文化和国界，具有深刻的内涵——生命的轮回、万物的盛衰，它也是一部探究有关生命中爱、责任与学习的温馨作品。电影中洋溢着浓厚的音乐气息，成功地营造出了自然界的生命气势。它向我们展示了一个新生的壮阔世界，让我们体验到爱与冒险的生命感动。它也以绚丽的色彩、动人的音乐、夸张的形态、幽默机智的语言和人性化的动作，使辛巴、娜娜、木法沙、西满、彭彭与刀疤、土狼之间的故事由片中史诗般的宏大场面和意味深长的演绎引发出了关生死轮回、智慧传递等终极问题的哲理思考。看到辛巴出生的时候，心里充满了喜悦，生命是一件多莫不可思议的事，伴随着画面上辛巴的父母的喜悦，所有狮子王国里动物的喜悦，我的心里也充满了感动得喜悦，会惹出那许多的麻烦。是它的父亲用爱和生命拯救了它，就像那晚他们仰望天上的星星时，真的很不愿意回忆木法沙惨死的画面，所有木法沙对辛巴的教育，所有的一个父亲应该对子女所做的一切，所有它付出的爱和努力，我突然发现了父爱的伟大，虽然还是很喜欢辛巴，已经深深体会了木法沙对辛巴的爱，当自己为这份爱感动的一塌糊涂，也更加明白了自己的父母对自己的爱。当为一份爱付出生命，是一件多莫伟大多莫了不起的事情，拥有足够的资格来承担世人对它的尊敬和崇拜。没有了父亲，无法回到自己的亲人身边，而自己的亲人也以为辛巴已经不在世界上，这是何其残酷的事实，辛巴的经历，真得让人感到一种无奈的辛酸。辛巴曾经颓废，曾经想不再回到自己的家乡，曾经想就这样无忧无虑的跟着蓬蓬和丁满过开心的日子。

3.狮子王的读后感二百

我看了《狮子王》这本书，它讲的是小狮子王辛巴成长的故事。他的叔叔——刀疤就很想得到他的王位，就引辛巴去大象墓园让土狼吃掉他，但是辛巴的爸爸——木法沙救了他，刀疤就想办法把木法沙杀了，刀疤又命令辛巴跑得远远的永远不要回来。没有食物没有水，野猪彭彭和猫鼬丁满把他带到了丛林里。辛巴在那里长大了。刀疤就当上了国王。

4.狮子王读后感

Hamlet,Home Improvement"where The Lion King'cataclysmic finale.I feel the need to point out that the MPAA ratings system has a perfunctory tendency to give G ratings to anything that is animated and has the word "Disney"above the title. While it probably isn't going to permeven if there weren'timeless entertainments of the 90s for young and old alike. Watching this will become an integral part of the "circle of life"for future generations for a long time to come.2The LION KING is technically an amazing and dazzling movie. I find it hard to review a cartoon. Perhaps,I expected more out of one of the most dramatic sounding voices in the movies today. Jones could have been a great orator (read politician I guess) had he not become an actor. Whoopi Goldberg was funny as a laughing hyena. I liked everyone except Mathew Broderick who I felt was too weak and unconvincing as the grown up Simba. The movie'were not in the characters. The images and the soundtrack were the highlights. All of treal"the main audience for this movie is little kids. I have a 5 year old boy who went with us. Why oh why did they have to have someone who viciously murders his own brother in the sight of his brother'Yes,he wants to see LASSIE even more.3Walt Disney came up with a winning formula when he made SNOW WHITE AND THE SEVEN DWARFS,his company refined that formula to a science. With the re-birth of Disney in the late 1980s,magical"these two men are not Walt Disney:re Hollywood studio executives. That means that you can expect them to milk a winning formula for all it'and not dare to push the edgs why. The spectacular box-office success of Disney're not going to want to make any changes. But they don'you risk losing the life-granting "spark"and as a result we can expect to see no changes in the formula for Disney animated films in the future. That formula is laid bare here:there are only the Good Guys and the Bad Guys--you know whom to root for,and give him a girlfriend--but make sure the hero is nicthey both make a big mistake;love"song to get the audience all weepy-eyed. When this formula works,because it made the Disney films seem fresh and new again. I loved ALADDIN in spite of its flaws--but if it weren't have Robin Williams;the great king,s not enough to keep this film from feeling like a re-hash. There's great--that'funny,"or even the fun "and "The songs were written by Tim Rice (who also worked on the ALADDIN soundtrack) and Elton John--who also sings the "love theme"but that'and one gets the impression that Disney is merely spinning its wheels. The Disney formula is starting to wear thin ... but as long as it keeps making millions ffresh,it is that the bigwigs at the top don't notice that the tree is sick until it's already rotten and ready to collapse or be cut down. I suspect that the same thing is starting with Disney:THE LION KING is merely one symptom of corporate rot that is starting to seep into the Disney empire--its movies are safe,the theme parks are expanding with seemingly endless re-hashes of the same few ideas (movie-based rides);or their proposed ceremonies for the World Cup tournament) consist of them spending money like water to flash and dazzle the eyes and promote themselves.

5.狮子王英文观后感

1Disney continues its string of instant classic family films with one of their best in recent years, The Lion King. Essentially, it's a loose interpolation of Shakespeare's "Hamlet," set in the fields of Africa, with lots of typical Disney anthropomorphic creatures to sing and dance for our every amusement. It's a solid endeavor, with excellent characterizations and a good deal of heart that keeps keen interest, while also blessed with a memorable soundtrack. Simba (voiced by Jonathan Taylor Thomas, "Home Improvement") is a lion cub currently being groomed to be the next king of the plains, which is currently the job of his father, the strong, brave Mufasa (James Earl Jones, The Sandlot). Mufasa's slighter, but wilier brother, Scar (Irons, Reversal of Fortune), wants to be the king in the worst way, and devises a plan to usurp the vaunted position for himself. But first, he needs to get Mufasa out of the way, and Simba as the next in the blood line. Banished in exile, Simba finds a life of no worries, but destiny calls him. Will he be ready to avenge Scar's misdeeds?The Lion King works on nearly every level. I won't go so far as saying it is a masterpiece, but it is definitely worthy of being called a classic in the Disney arc, containing all of the elements that the greats of the 1930s and 1940s delivered. Although many clearly will be enamored of the catchy soundtrack, or the colorful animation, where The Lion King's strength really lies is in good storytelling. You feel for Simba and his plight, which pays off well during the sadder moments, later becoming thrilling when the confrontation between the Simba and Scar manifests itself in a fiery, cataclysmic finale.I feel the need to point out that the MPAA ratings system has a perfunctory tendency to give G ratings to anything that is animated and has the word "Disney" above the title. While it probably isn't going to permanently wreck the psyche of any young children out there, The Lion King is quite a dark, scary and often violent film. Yes, it's all a cartoon, but there is a murder of a main character, and a handful of attempted killings throughout, and while people feel that animation equals innocuous fare, The Lion King is not cartoonish in its handling of these adult themes. Heck, the flatulence alone should have been enough to kick it to PG, even if there weren't several scenes of murder and mayhem.On the flip side, The Lion King will appeal to adults more than most Disney films just by being more mature in its themes, so even adults without children should find much to like here. Nice scenery, pleasant music, and a very strong story all add up to one of the grand, timeless entertainments of the 90s for young and old alike. Watching this will become an integral part of the "circle of life" for future generations for a long time to come.2The LION KING is technically an amazing and dazzling movie. I find it hard to review a cartoon. Perhaps, I could start by discussing some of the characters that were made special by the actor's voice. Hands down, the best voice in this movie was that of Jeremy Irons who was the evil Scar, brother of the king Mufasa. Irons is brilliant in everything he does, but I think his best roles were BRIDESHEAD REVISITED and REVERSAL OF FORTUNE. He can play villains and good guys equally well. James Earl Jones was the voice of Mufasa, and although he was good, I expected more out of one of the most dramatic sounding voices in the movies today. Jones could have been a great orator (read politician I guess) had he not become an actor. Whoopi Goldberg was funny as a laughing hyena. I liked everyone except Mathew Broderick who I felt was too weak and unconvincing as the grown up Simba. The movie's strengths, however, were not in the characters. The images and the soundtrack were the highlights. All of the music was very moving. The images had a 3D effect that I have not seen before. There was clear foreground and background in almost every shot, and sometimes they even varied the focus as you would in a "real" movie so that at first the foreground was in focus and then the background. My favorite part of the entire show was the vibrance of the colors. Monet would have come every day to see The LION KING. Sad to say, I can not give it as high a rating as I would liked for two reasons. First, the story and the characters were okay, but they were not as interesting as they could have been. When they have to resort to lots of jokes about gas and bad breath, you know the script writers have run out of steam. Second, the main audience for this movie is little kids. I have a 5 year old boy who went with us. Why oh why did they have to have someone who viciously murders his own brother in the sight of his brother's son? And if they felt they had to kill off a character, why be so explicit? Yes, this part of life does happen, but so does rape, incest, drive-by shootings and a lot of other stuff. Being true to life does not mean we have to subject little kids to it. By the way, my son spent almost the whole movie in one of our laps, but claimed in the end to have not been scared (he was clearly scared while it was going on), and wanted to see it again. Actually, he wants to see LASSIE even more.3Walt Disney came up with a winning formula when he made SNOW WHITE AND THE SEVEN DWARFS, back in 1937; over the years, his company refined that formula to a science. With the re-birth of Disney in the late 1980s, the "magical" formula for Disney animation was re-discovered by Jeff Katzenberg and Michael Eisner, the studio heads. Unfortunately, these two men are not Walt Disney: they're Hollywood studio executives. That means that you can expect them to milk a winning formula for all it's worth, and not dare to push the edge. If it works, why change it? Because you can wear it out, that's why. The spectacular box-office success of Disney's animated films (except for THE RESCUERS DOWN UNDER, which deserved to do better) has blinded the men on the top of the heap; as long as the money keeps rolling in, they're not going to want to make any changes. But they don't see that when you rely too heavy on a safe, predictable formula, you risk losing the life-granting "spark" that infuses your creations with energy--and keeps the money rolling in. THE LION KING is going to make another pile of money for Disney, and as a result we can expect to see no changes in the formula for Disney animated films in the future. That formula is laid bare here: - Pour lots of money into producing great animation. This is the easy part. The Disney studios have hundreds of artists and the latest computer technology to produce lavish, dazzling animation that can be matched by no one else. There are some amazing moments here, especially during the opening sequence (which Disney has pushed for months, revealing this sequence at its many Disney Stores as early as February) and a scene where Mufasa speaks to his son from the clouds. The animation on the rest of the movie is also good, as one expects from Disney. But is great animation the only reason we watch Disney films? No. The formula has more ingredients, such as .... - Create an evil, sneaky villain, and then let him be utterly defeated (preferably in the midst of an inferno of some sort, with lightning and smoke and explosions and fire to make it more dramatic). With the Disney formula, there are only the Good Guys and the Bad Guys--you know whom to root for, because the Bad Guys are always drawn in a cartoonish way that makes them look less than human. The perfect hero and heroine battle the freaks, and guess who wins in the end? - Create a hero, and give him a girlfriend--but make sure the hero is nice and bland. What's the difference between Simba, the hero of this film, and Aladdin? Nothing at all, other than being drawn differently. They're both young and naive; they both make a big mistake; they both correct that mistake by beating the Bad Guy once and for all. And the girlfriend must be equally bland, though at least in ALADDIN Princess Jasmine was a major character. In THE LION KING, the girlfriend is merely there for the hero to grow up with, and to bring him back to face his big mistake so that the movie can reach its climax. Why must the hero and his girlfriend be so generic and uninteresting? So that they won't overshadow the supporting characters, as we see in the next ingredient .... - For comic relief (and merchandising), through in a few goofy characters to play the hero's friends. These characters always act silly, and they get the lion's share (pun intended) of the laughs, except during the climax when they stay by the hero's side and battle the bad guys. - And of course, include a bunch of musical numbers. Ever since THE LITTLE MERMAID won the Oscars for Best Original Score and Best Song, Disney has been pushing its animated films as the last bastion of the Hollywood musical. Each of their animated films includes a bunch of bouncy numbers as filler, one Busby Berkeley surrealist musical number, and a sappy, treacly "love" song to get the audience all weepy-eyed. When this formula works, it can awaken the child in us. I enjoyed THE LITTLE MERMAID, because it made the Disney films seem fresh and new again. I loved ALADDIN in spite of its flaws--but if it weren't for Robin Williams, that movie would have fallen flat on its face, because it was nothing but Disney formula. THE LION KING doesn't have Robin Williams; and while it does have James Earl Jones' booming baritone as Mufasa, the great king, that's not enough to keep this film from feeling like a re-hash. There's nothing new here, and there's not enough creativity to make it seem refreshing. Sure, the animation's great--that's easy for Disney to do, because they've got millions of dollars to do it. But there's more to making a great film than merely dazzling the eyes, whether it's with animated lions, computer-generated dinosaurs or exploding bridges (which we'll see in TRUE LIES). As in all great movies, it's the story and the characters that count, and there's nothing in here that we haven't seen before. Mufasa himself is a regal, majestic figure; the comic-relief characters are funny; and the evil Scar is wicked and properly evil. But Disney has given us a long line of majestic, funny, and evil characters, from Cruella de Vil and Stromboli to Gaston and Iago; the characters in THE LION KING simply aren't charismatic enough to come out from the shadow of their predecessors. As if to add insult to injury, the musical numbers are downright awful. There's nothing in here to match the catchy, joyful "Under The Sea and "Be Our Guest," or even the fun "Prince Ali" and "Never Had A Friend Like Me." The songs were written by Tim Rice (who also worked on the ALADDIN soundtrack) and Elton John--who also sings the "love theme" over the ending credits. Bleah. Disney is certain to push this soundtrack for the Oscar...but if it actually wins, it will be undeniable proof that taste is dead in Hollywood. There IS a reasonably good musical score by Hans Zimmer that's based on on African music (though why didn't Disney just bring in some real African musicians to compose it?), but that's about all the praise I can give it. The problem is simply that we've seen it all before. Nothing is new here, and one gets the impression that Disney is merely spinning its wheels. The Disney formula is starting to wear thin ... but as long as it keeps making millions for the company, we're not going to see anything different. In this respect, one can say that BEAUTY AND THE BEAST was the most original Disney film in a long time, because while it included many aspects of the Disney formula (animation, musical numbers, comedy relief characters), it actually worked on real characterization (at least on the part of the Beast himself) and an entertaining story (though I detested the character of Gaston). But that film proved to be an exception to the rule. ALADDIN, despite Robin Williams' delightful presence, was merely a return to the old formula ... the same formula that mires down THE LION KING. This does not bode well for the long-term future of American animated films. Hollywood is falling once again into the trap of trying to imitate Disney, rather than experimenting with other ways of making animated films. But Walt Disney himself knew that if you don't keep looking forward and aiming for something new, fresh, and different, you're liable to dig your own grave. Disney has reached the height of its popularity; in fact, it may have already passed that peak (note the troubles of Euro Disneyland). But if corporate history has any precedents, it is that the bigwigs at the top don't notice that the tree is sick until it's already rotten and ready to collapse or be cut down. I suspect that the same thing is starting with Disney: THE LION KING is merely one symptom of corporate rot that is starting to seep into the Disney empire--its movies are safe, non-controversial, and bland; the theme parks are expanding with seemingly endless re-hashes of the same few ideas (movie-based rides); and all of the company's other projects (the BEAUTY AND THE BEAST stage musical, or their proposed ceremonies for the World Cup tournament) consist of them spending money like water to flash and dazzle the eyes and promote themselves.

6.读绘本《狮子王》的感受

这本书描写了森林里的狮子王国，住着狮王穆法沙和他的臣民，狮王穆法沙有个儿子叫辛巴，是只可爱、聪明的小狮子，他将来会继承王位做狮王的。可是辛巴的叔叔刀疤却是一个坏心眼的野心家，他一直想夺王位。他和阴险的土狼们合伙对付狮王。他们想了一个坏点子，把辛巴围困了要杀死他，狮王穆法沙为了救他的儿子，辛巴知道爸爸死亡的消息，很消沉地到处流浪，再也不愿回家了，刀疤趁机夺取了王位。辛巴渐渐长大了，他的好朋友妮妮来找他，说刀疤和土狼们把狮子王国搞得很糟糕，让辛巴回去，辛巴也记起了爸爸曾经说过的话，辛巴决定回到自己的国家找刀疤夺回王位。他在妈妈、妮妮、爸爸的旧部下和好朋友野猪的帮助下，勇敢地战胜了刀疤。

7.我的爸爸是狮子王写读后感

提取自己感受中的精华。读任何读物人都会有些想法，比如故事中的任务有什么性格，说话有哪些特色，当时的背景为什么会出现这些事，或者作者的安排人物出场是否得当。

8.狮子王英语读后感100字

Friendship,with his uncle taking his father'Simba finally defeated his uncle and became the king of the animals. This film taught me that a friend in need is a friend indeed and that only through perseverance can one reach his goal.